I found a few parts of this article to be quite insightful, barring a statistical analysis using data that's not available: * The use of a real lab to tear dow

I found a few parts of this article to be quite insightful, barring a statistical analysis using data that's not available: * The use of a real lab to tear down and inspect a microwave, identifying a real design flaw leading to a safety hazard. This seems to indicate that Amazon did not send their product for independent inspection before sourcing it, or that the labs or staff they used to do so were less thorough or competent than the lab CNN found. * Interviews with former Amazon staff indicating that standards have likely been loosened, because public available information (like reviews) which would have triggered a product's removal in the past no longer seem to do so.