3 ms·
You seem to crap on all of them. Not sure they are major problems of the game, or nitpicking. Which one is good/worth to play for a novice?
by ardit33 6y ago
You seem to crap on all of them. Not sure they are major problems of the game, or nitpicking.
Which one is good/worth to play for a novice?
- dragontamer 6y agoStrangely enough, I like FreeCiv the most. Its mostly based on Civ2, but it takes a few nice features like boarders from the later games. There's a huge degree of customization. The main issue of FreeCiv is that its an open source game with poor music / graphics compared to Civ6. --------- Civ6 is the best graphically by far. Its available on a wide variety of platforms. Arguably, the simplified combat system is better for a beginner (but for me, I just get bored with it a lot faster). I guess Civ6 might be best for a beginner: the modern community is on Civ6, its got the music and graphics you'd expect from a AAA-game. But as far as actually thinking about strategy, build orders, and competitive play? I think FreeCiv (Civ2) is the deeper game by all measures.
- mr-ron 6y agoThat poster is definitely nitpicking. Ive seen most people point to V as the goto for novices. Its cheap, super engaging like all Civs are, and misses a lot of of the nitpicky flaws that are prevalent in VI