3 ms·
> 4K/60 or 1440p/240 are the golden standards Those are $1200+ monitors at any decent resolution. EDIT: by resolution I mean the horizontal dimension of the m
by tmpz22 6y ago
> 4K/60 or 1440p/240 are the golden standards
Those are $1200+ monitors at any decent resolution.
EDIT: by resolution I mean the horizontal dimension of the monitor, where pc enthusiasts typically go for 27+ inches in width which are more expensive as you scale in size, add a curve, etc.
- nitrogen 6y agoAnd you're talking about $600-$1200 GPUs, plus similar or higher for CPU+MB+RAM. People who buy these things are willing to pay for maximum performance.
- the_pwner224 6y agoYou can get a real good quality 4k60 for $400, or one with shitty color for much less. The LG 27gn950 is 4k144 + full DCI-P3 for $800, but unfortunately has been sold out everywhere since it was released a week or two ago.
- xxpor 6y agoI bought this 4k/60 monitor for $500 3 years ago: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00SHZSXVI/ref=asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00SHZSXVI/ref=asin_title?... No gsync/freesync, but I wasn't intending to game on it anyway.
- gameswithgo 6y agothe resolution is specified, do you mean image quality? gamers tend to sacrifice that for refresh speed and low input latency. There appears to be no FPS performance gain going from 144hz to 240hz though so you don't have to get crazy.
- tmpz22 6y agoI meant the dimensions of the monitor i.e. 27in, 32in, etc. 27 inches seems to be one of the most popular dimensions.