> Only a selfish species would say that or one who wants to feel good. But probably we can agree that, even if it would be better to make the world better for

> Only a selfish species would say that or one who wants to feel good. But probably we can agree that, even if it would be better to make the world better for all of its inhabitants, including non-humans, at least it would be a good start on the process to try to work on reducing the collective misery of humans. Much like accessibility changes benefit everyone, a lot of the changes that will make life better for all humankind will also make life better for all the planet's inhabitants. (For example, one component of reducing misery even if we focus only on humans is reducing the disruptions due to climate change.)