5 ms·
Low-level as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-_and_low-level http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-_and_low-level, not as in "very little access" (which I'm ass
by nbpoole 16y ago
Low-level as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-_and_low-level http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-_and_low-level, not as in "very little access" (which I'm assuming is the impression you're getting: correct me if I'm mistaken)
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- nikcub 16y agoI see that meaning but the way it was written you would think the context was access
- nbpoole 16y agoAnd low-level access (to me) means root access. The only lower level access I can think of would be if someone broke into the datacenter and stole the server ;)
- nikcub 16y agoI think most people that read the story will read it that same way though, since it says 'Automatic had a low-level break-in' bah - who cares, they have bigger problems than PR message wording
- trotsky 16y agobroke into the fab and altered the microcode ;)
- zheng 16y agoDon't even need to do that, a simple BIOS update can update the microcode on most semi-recent Intels. EDIT: I'd assume other architectures as well, Intels are the only ones I know about, however.