The article you cite does not claim that the Navalny poisoning was a US/Saudi false flag. On the contrary, Murry states: "I should state that I have no diffic

The article you cite does not claim that the Navalny poisoning was a US/Saudi false flag. On the contrary, Murry states: "I should state that I have no difficulty at all with the notion that a powerful oligarch or an organ of the Russian state may have tried to assassinate Navalny". The article states that "[T]he US and Saudi Arabia have every reason to instigate a split between Germany and Russia at this time." The US has gone out of the way to prevent the NordStream 2 pipeline, and directly after Navalny was flown to Germany, several high-ranking German politicians (including Merkel), have began publicly to question whether NordStream 2 should be reconsidered, in the light of Navalny, see [1]. May I gently request that you exercise more care when representing Murray's views? Please reconsider the HN guidelines for comments [2], reproduced here for your convenience: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." [1] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54070046 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54070046 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html