37 ms·

Fact checks from zero credibility organizations like Reuters don't hold any weight with me and shouldn't with anyone else. That's not even Mullis' original quo

Fact checks from zero credibility organizations like Reuters don't hold any weight with me and shouldn't with anyone else. That's not even Mullis' original quote. I'm actually not sure what the fact check proves. Okay fine, let's say Reuters is correct and Mullis never said whatever quote some randoms on Facebook are trying to say he said. Here's a research paper pointing out everything wrong with the PCR test: http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf Let me know what you think.

mikeyouse 6y ago
You call Reuters zero credibility but then link to some crank with a background in telecom litigation with no virology experience whatsoever who denies that we can sequence viral DNA? https://davidcrowe.ca/cnp-wireless.com/dcroweresumelib.php https://davidcrowe.ca/cnp-wireless.com/dcroweresumelib.php Holy shit, of course that nutjob is also an AIDS truther: https://www.davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/alive-aids-stats.html https://www.davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/alive-aids-stats.html And still was in 2014! (Ctrl + F “David Crowe” in the comments): https://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/26/publisher-issues-statement-of-concern-about-hiv-denial-paper-launches-investigation/ https://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/26/publisher-issues-stat... Find better role models.
- pieceofcakedude 6y ago
  Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test that we're all putting blind faith into, is an AIDS truther as well. Mullis talking about his experience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaMZ4NyNCwI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaMZ4NyNCwI Questioning known corrupt organizations like the FDA, CDC and WHO makes me feel better, not worse about Mullis and Crowe. It's the scientists who blindly follow authority who really make me nervous. But that's just me. Sounds like you might be in the opposite camp. I've looked through your link and saw Crowe in the comments section. He mentions there are two new hypotheses in 2014, hence why its still being discussed. They really have no answer for his questions besides "move on, the science is settled". But critically look at his points, maybe you can address them. BTW, anyone who ever tries to to tell you "the science is settled" is trying to shut down debate, as Crowe correctly recognizes. Any comments on the actual paper itself that Crowe wrote? You don't need a background in virology to figure out that there's giant issues with the PCR test. If you read the paper at all you'd see that, but I'm guessing you didn't.
  - mikeyouse 6y ago
    Kary Mullis was an astrologist who thought that environmentalists were responsible for the AIDS hoax and wrote the forward to an AIDS denialist book written by a person who with her 3-year old daughter then died of AIDS a few years later. There is literally no benefit to engaging with these charlatans or their half baked ideas. Have you ever run a PCR? It's not magic and none of the arguments by these bizarre COVID truthers hold any water when there are thousands of people using them in research every single day.

mikeyouse 6y ago

You call Reuters zero credibility but then link to some crank with a background in telecom litigation with no virology experience whatsoever who denies that we can sequence viral DNA? https://davidcrowe.ca/cnp-wireless.com/dcroweresumelib.php https://davidcrowe.ca/cnp-wireless.com/dcroweresumelib.php Holy shit, of course that nutjob is also an AIDS truther: https://www.davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/alive-aids-stats.html https://www.davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/alive-aids-stats.html And still was in 2014! (Ctrl + F “David Crowe” in the comments): https://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/26/publisher-issues-statement-of-concern-about-hiv-denial-paper-launches-investigation/ https://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/26/publisher-issues-stat... Find better role models.

pieceofcakedude 6y ago
Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test that we're all putting blind faith into, is an AIDS truther as well. Mullis talking about his experience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaMZ4NyNCwI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaMZ4NyNCwI Questioning known corrupt organizations like the FDA, CDC and WHO makes me feel better, not worse about Mullis and Crowe. It's the scientists who blindly follow authority who really make me nervous. But that's just me. Sounds like you might be in the opposite camp. I've looked through your link and saw Crowe in the comments section. He mentions there are two new hypotheses in 2014, hence why its still being discussed. They really have no answer for his questions besides "move on, the science is settled". But critically look at his points, maybe you can address them. BTW, anyone who ever tries to to tell you "the science is settled" is trying to shut down debate, as Crowe correctly recognizes. Any comments on the actual paper itself that Crowe wrote? You don't need a background in virology to figure out that there's giant issues with the PCR test. If you read the paper at all you'd see that, but I'm guessing you didn't.
- mikeyouse 6y ago
  Kary Mullis was an astrologist who thought that environmentalists were responsible for the AIDS hoax and wrote the forward to an AIDS denialist book written by a person who with her 3-year old daughter then died of AIDS a few years later. There is literally no benefit to engaging with these charlatans or their half baked ideas. Have you ever run a PCR? It's not magic and none of the arguments by these bizarre COVID truthers hold any water when there are thousands of people using them in research every single day.