I have no problem with facial recognition. It is as, if not more, useful as/than an eye witness. Which means to say, use that as a basis for collecting evidence

I have no problem with facial recognition. It is as, if not more, useful as/than an eye witness. Which means to say, use that as a basis for collecting evidence, but not as evidence itself. For example, if facial recognition linked a looter to John, then have a police officer manually review the security camera and have that police officer file the report. I would hate for John to be arrested due to the "algorithm" and then try to dispute the arrest, only to be told that there is nothing to be done, the "algorithm" has decided.