> I'd also remark that perhaps you wouldn't be so quick to comment in such a trite way if Wiki had instead make a statement on respecting people's sexualities.

> I'd also remark that perhaps you wouldn't be so quick to comment in such a trite way if Wiki had instead make a statement on respecting people's sexualities. Once controversial, now widely accepted as a facet of who people are, and originally a darling cause of the left. It's recognised as a human rights issue, which is to say it has outgrown reasonable politics. I look forward to gender identity doing the same. That's exactly the issue. This claims to be universal but it is just progressive western values. I wouldn't expect a Wahabist contributing to Wikipedia to respect sexuality or pronouns, and as long as they are civil why should they have to in order to participate in a universal project?