What is "fair, neutral, and global" is also all debatable, especially when it comes to human interactions, and ultimately distills into arguing epistemology. A

What is "fair, neutral, and global" is also all debatable, especially when it comes to human interactions, and ultimately distills into arguing epistemology. A code of conduct's purpose is to bound and define the operational environment towards facilitating and progressing the foundation's goals by minimizing distracting or otherwise negative impacts of any particular action, regardless of what those actions may be and who perpetrates them. There is no prerequisite of objectivity to such a code, nor can anyone say what is objectively true in these situations. There's a reason juries aren't algorithmic. You can only try to determine what is the most conducive approach to the goals of the organization in the cultural frame it operates in, which it seems they have done.