>he has unilateral control of the company Bu that reasoning, if 1000 people each own 0.1% of a company, and one buys another out, then the person with 0.2% has

>he has unilateral control of the company Bu that reasoning, if 1000 people each own 0.1% of a company, and one buys another out, then the person with 0.2% has "unilateral control of the company", implying that the other 99.8% could not stop the desires or action of the 0.2%. This is nonsense. Any 3 of the 999 could stop the 1.