4 ms·
I am trying to reconcile what I read in the comments and the article. Namely, - we are using nearfield. No sidelobe. - 2.4 - 5.5 GHz - long distance (I am as
by panda88888 6y ago
I am trying to reconcile what I read in the comments and the article. Namely,
- we are using nearfield. No sidelobe.
- 2.4 - 5.5 GHz
- long distance (I am assuming km’s)
Is there anything to read so I can better understand the technology?
- tyingq 6y agoNo, you're right. They call it near field for a reason. Likely single or double-digit meters in distance depending on the antenna size for that frequency range. For example, 10 foot antenna, 4Ghz == 12 meters of "reactive near field" or ~250 meters of "radiating near field" though the claim is it's not radiating, therefore it's safe. Either this is bs, or something important isn't being said.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]