3 ms·
There’s definitely more there than most .NET devs need to know, but I personally have found learning more about the GC to be incredibly relevant in my day to da
by sbelskie 6y ago
There’s definitely more there than most .NET devs need to know, but I personally have found learning more about the GC to be incredibly relevant in my day to day work. I would have said the same thing a year ago, now I feel differently, but that is of course heavily inflected by my personal experience.
- jolux 6y agoSimilarly you might not expect that reading CLR via C# would make you a better programmer at a high level with things like DI and big frameworks and everything, but it makes you see what you're writing in an entirely different light. A whole other layer below the surface.
- sbelskie 6y agoI would strongly second that endorsement. I would love a new edition taking the CoreCLR more into account but it’s still more relevant than most any other book I can think of.
- pjmlp 6y agoThere is a version for UWP as well.
- jolux 6y agoReally? What’s it called?
- pjmlp 6y agoSimilarly named, Windows Runtime via C#. https://www.amazon.com/Windows-Runtime-via-Developer-Reference/dp/0735679274 https://www.amazon.com/Windows-Runtime-via-Developer-Referen...
- jolux 6y agoNeat! I would definitely like a .NET Core version, though. I was disappointed to discover netmodules were deprecated