3 ms·
There's a test linked to see if you might be a super recognizer. It only used Caucasian faces. Insert epic facepalm here.
by autarch 6y ago
There's a test linked to see if you might be a super recognizer. It only used Caucasian faces. Insert epic facepalm here.
- croissants 6y agoAfter doing the first test, I got a link to a second test of 50 faces, almost all of which were not Caucasian. So I'm not sure what's happening here.
- autarch 6y agoAh, that's good. I just did the first test. I wasn't up for the longer version.
- bagels 6y agohttps://greenwichuniversity.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_e3xDuCccGAdgbfT?Source=Website https://greenwichuniversity.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_e3x... So you don't have to hunt for it too.
- searchableguy 6y agoThat was one boring "research" survey. I skimped through the first one and got 14 out of 14 and in the second one, I slept through it. Just clicked on slider at random without looking. Seems flawed.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- marktangotango 6y ago> It happened so often that I just thought I took more notice of people and I was completely forgettable. I‘ve felt like this my entire life. The test says I might be a super recognizer, better than being forgettable I guess!
- axaxs 6y agoDid you do the test? It seemed very basic and simple, to me. I got 13/14 which it says 'may be a superrecognizer', but I definitely don't think I am, so assume the test isn't much good. Curious to know how others fare.
- bloak 6y agoI tested everyone in my family with an online test of facial recognition (probably it was https://facetest.psy.unsw.edu.au/ https://facetest.psy.unsw.edu.au/). The results from the online test did not correlate with our real-life experience: a person who is very bad at recognising people in real life got a slightly better score on the online test than a person who is very good at recognising people in real life.