> 'm not sure the public is better served by a store from a company that punches so low. Using they customers as fodder is not I would say that applies to appl

> 'm not sure the public is better served by a store from a company that punches so low. Using they customers as fodder is not I would say that applies to apple lot more than epic , they have hurt their customers . Apple could also have taken epic to the courts as well and got their way if it was fair. Remember apple did the actual ban and is hurting the users now .