4 ms·
The problem with aggregate numbers like that 6% is that they assume a uniform distribution of the virus within the population, which is not the case: some areas
by lbeltrame 6y ago
The problem with aggregate numbers like that 6% is that they assume a uniform distribution of the virus within the population, which is not the case: some areas are far more hit than others. I think this should always be kept into account.
- orra 6y agoYeah, in major population centres like London, about 20% of people caught it. Whereas rural England will be lower than that 6% average. That’s the areas. As for age or demographics of people who caught it in England, I don’t think that is well known.