4 ms·
Well, unless you can come up with a source (any source, even if it is in your native language), I can't judge your claims other than "made up". There's enough u
by itcrowd 6y ago
Well, unless you can come up with a source (any source, even if it is in your native language), I can't judge your claims other than "made up". There's enough unsubstantiated (mis)information out there about sars-cov-2, we don't need you to post more without evidence.
- SomeoneFromCA 6y agoOh well this exactly this arrogant high-horse first world attitude I was talking about.
- SomeoneFromCA 6y agoIf you insist here is a proof that is been know at least for a month (https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/south-korea-finds-new-mutated-coronavirus/1936968 https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/south-korea-finds-new-...). Emergence of a mutation in relatively big (33 mln people) country is definitely a major event, yet the information is still scarce, which is puzzling. I have no idea why, but I am used to the reality of ignoring my region. I understand there is a type of people, especially in places like HN, who require some rubber-stamped peer reviewed proofs for everything, but for these "reliable sources" to appear at first place, the issue has to catch attention of the scientific world. It is not catching attention, not even tiniest mention in the articles, such the linked by the OP. It puzzles me, and make me think that there might be other mutations, which are not known, in places like ex-USSR.
- itcrowd 6y agoNothing in your source about the mutations being slower to spread or more deadly. In fact, the mutations aren't named and D614A is not mentioned. None of your claims held up to even the slightest scrutiny. Your credibility has officially been lost and I will not reply to you any further.