5 ms·
"Conversely, it is used all the time for censorship and policing in China." Sure- in China. I'm not in China. Censorship might be a problem, but outside of tha
by XMPPwocky 6y ago
"Conversely, it is used all the time for censorship and policing in China."
Sure- in China. I'm not in China. Censorship might be a problem, but outside of that, I'd much rather have the Chinese government (and even Chinese local police!) have my metadata, and even data, than give the US national security apparatus the same access.
Corporate IP is another exception to this- it's pretty clearly better that the US, rather than China, have access to my work data.
But for, say, a Snowden-esque whistleblower in the US- can you really say they'd be better off with, say, DHS having access to all their data instead of the Chinese government? Obviously ideally nobody would, but for them, a system whose failure mode is "China can associate your IP and email address" is, I believe, dramatically better than "DHS/NSA can associate your IP and email address".
- jjcon 6y ago> But for, say, a Snowden-esque whistleblower in the US Sure if you are acting on the state level against US or European governments China would be better but for everyone else I think it’s extremely safe to say US/EU. I’ll add though that I am fairly confident the security of your data in the hands of the Chinese Government is far less secure than when in US/EU. Just last year hundreds of millions (yes hundreds) of social media logs and private chats were released on the web from a hack on a Chinese surveillance system.