3 ms·
"Ultimately, the technology may help power rural areas or transmit energy from offshore wind farms, both cases where it’s expensive to build physical infrastruc
by hellotomyrars 6y ago
"Ultimately, the technology may help power rural areas or transmit energy from offshore wind farms, both cases where it’s expensive to build physical infrastructure to tap or feed the grid."
While I understand case 1 and I worry some people don't understand that even if we get the tech figured out it's going to only make sense in certain contexts (at least until/unless we have infinite `free` power), but I think #2 is a bit weird.
Yes building that infrastructure to the wind farm is costly/difficult but also... It seems weird to bottleneck the generation at the gen site. I guess if the infrastructure costs for wireless transmission are minimal you could get things bootstrapped easier/cheaper but it def seems shortsighted if you're already creating a big loss at the first stage of generation.
- thysultan 6y agoYou can have a satellite at low earth orbit taking energy from the sun or even more ambitiously nuclear fusion(like the sun) that may very well be easier to archive in low gravity of near space, then transmit this to a base earth station. It would be near-free in the same sense that the suns energy is near-free.
- minitoar 6y agoJust use some mirrors and ground based pv?