5 ms·
This just makes it risky for the consumer to rely on 'Sign in with Apple', especially for cross-platform applications. I found it extremely convenient especial
by bmarquez 6y ago
This just makes it risky for the consumer to rely on 'Sign in with Apple', especially for cross-platform applications.
I found it extremely convenient especially from a privacy perspective (your name and email are hidden) but the risk I'll lose access to my accounts is too much.
- prophesi 6y agoI think this shows the risks of relying on _any_ social sign in. If that endpoint breaks, whether via a protocol upgrade, server downtime, or what have you, you can now no longer access any services relying on that social login.
- lolsal 6y ago> This just makes it risky for the consumer to rely on 'Sign in with Apple', especially for cross-platform applications. The risk/reward cuts both ways. If a developer starts putting malware/whatever in their apps and Apple nukes their access to "Sign On With Apple" then it protects me as a user, and I value that.
- badwolf 6y agoSame with 'Sign in with Facebook' If Facebook blocks your developer account (Had this happen to my company once) your users can no longer sign in - though are they really your users at that point, or are they (Facebook/Google/Apple/etc...)