4 ms·
The article avoids directly addressing this, but I think is the real elephant in the room -- whether you have the right to web scrape for research. The article
by lazyjeff 6y ago
The article avoids directly addressing this, but I think is the real elephant in the room -- whether you have the right to web scrape for research.
The article says, "You might be able to use what you scrape, but it’s worth checking that you can also legally share it. Ideally, the website content licence [sic] will be readily available."
In practice, the data you want to scrape either has 1) no license/information about whether they are okay with you scraping it (and if they are okay with it, they usually offer the source data anyways), or more commonly they 2) strictly prohibit it in the terms of service, in which case it's not clear whether a scraper which mimics a browser falls under fair use.
It's an area where when you ask your university attorney, they exchange a few emails with you and then avoid making any decision. I think it's just because it's not well tested in court (at least when I encountered these situations), and depends on whether you'd be subject to a takedown notice or lawsuit.
- elwell 6y ago> it's not clear whether a scraper which mimics a browser falls under fair use Or what about a 'human scraper' a la Amazon MTurk?
- hansvm 6y agoIt's rarely the scraper that runs afoul of legal complications (as always, with exceptions); it's what you do with the scraped data.
- dvdkon 6y ago"licence" is the non-USA spelling.
- abandonliberty 6y agoPossibly the more common spelling, given that there's more English speakers in India, Pakistan, and Nigeria than the USA. Very strange fact. Too bad I can't find a measure of English content written by country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-s...