>but if not for that trail, it would actually be impacted more. Or maybe it would impact it less by keeping tourists out. If it's about compromise, maybe we sh

>but if not for that trail, it would actually be impacted more. Or maybe it would impact it less by keeping tourists out. If it's about compromise, maybe we shouldn't call it Leave No Trace? That phrasing doesn't imply compromise, but it seems like every individual has their own ruleset when it comes to LNT, even though the wording is pretty absolute.