There are some interesting points in there but also a lot of BS. I mean for one how can you trust him not practicing subversion himself. It feels like he is p

There are some interesting points in there but also a lot of BS. I mean for one how can you trust him not practicing subversion himself. It feels like he is proposing a state that is concretely tied down to whatever current stable that state is in and staying there forever. Any change can be considered a foreign subversive action. Another point of criticism is that is USSR taught those lessons to its people then how come they literally fell into that trap, resulting in break up of USSR.