3 ms·
Exactly. Most people just don't want to accept the fact that when it comes to energy density, nothing compares to nuclear. Nothing even comes close. https://d
by reegnz 6y ago
Exactly.
Most people just don't want to accept the fact that when it comes to energy density, nothing compares to nuclear. Nothing even comes close.
https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/11/pump-up-the-storage/ https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/11/pump-up-the-storage/
- dave333 6y agoeven if nuclear had no contamination horrors, this is no longer true. Hydrino energy is much more energy dense and will be the ubiquitous portable power source for the 21st century and beyond. https://brilliantlightpower.com/news/ https://brilliantlightpower.com/news/
- reegnz 6y agoMy comment might be read as 'Nothing will EVER compare to nuclear'. While in fact what I meant was 'CURRENTLY nothing scientifically viable compares to nuclear.' I do have high hopes about fusion and molten salt thorium is also up there as something I'd like to be further explored. But currently nothing up and coming seems to compare to nuclear. I just did a quick skim of the wikipedia page of that 'hydrino' stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power#Criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power#Criticis.... I'm not an expert, but reading those criticisms makes me think this is nothing more than a money grab scheme without delivering anything usable for the past 30 years. Also, this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24423103 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24423103