4 ms·
I think a big difference between Civ games and chess is that chess has very easy-to-learn mechanics. There are only a half dozen different pieces and the rules
by freeAgent 6y ago
I think a big difference between Civ games and chess is that chess has very easy-to-learn mechanics. There are only a half dozen different pieces and the rules are pretty simple. A beginner can start playing almost immediately and have fun from the start. I think Civ’s mechanics are several orders of magnitude more complex.
- fossuser 6y agoYes - chess has a relatively simple and limited ruleset, the complexity comes from the combinations possible. Civ6 has a crazy amount of complexity to do basic actions - the complexity comes from the UI and all the rules, each city has a ton of things to build which each take many turns, there’s multiple skill trees of unclear benefits, there’s governments and policies, where you can build and what you need to build isn’t clear. During all of this kind of tedious action nothing interesting is happening. I’d guess there’s a baked in assumption that people playing are already familiar with the game. The tutorial and in game recommended actions were not great. I don’t mind some complexity (I like KSP, Starcraft) - Civ6 feels like a bad design problem.
- throwaway56034 6y ago> Civ6 feels like a bad design problem. Definitely! Multiple core mechanics are downright broken. Religion for example is a complete waste of time, as it has practically zero consequences outside of the mechanic itself. I can routinely beat the game while completely ignoring religion.