6 ms·

No one's stopping you from using only Apple store. Why force your choice on other consumers? Let people decide what's best for them

pjmlp 6y ago
They have the choice to buy other brands.
- dr_dshiv 6y ago
  They also have the choice to avoid smartphones altogether. What they want, though, is the ability to use apple hardware and non-apple software. The only reason they can't is because Apple won't let them, unless they pay a 30% commission
  - pjmlp 6y ago
    One cannot buy a house besides a landing lane and then complain planes are taking off and landing all day long. If iOS doesn't offer what they want, don't buy Apple, plain and simple, there is nothing more to discuss and the judge will set this straight.
    - harpratap 6y ago
      In developed countries there are laws preventing sale of properties where noise may be so high that it's detrimental to one's health. So if the competition in market is hurting the merchants or consumers, it should be rightfully outlawed.
      - pjmlp 6y ago
        The market is mobile phones, get a device not produced by Apple and be done with it.
        simion314 6y ago
        But if the judge decides that Apple abuses are legal the Google will do it too, then the you will say "Buy a FSF phone if you don't want Silicon Valley abuses, nobody is forcing you to have a phone or Internet"
        pjmlp 6y ago
        What abuses? They are doing nothing that game consoles haven't been doing for 40 years now, or mobile stores since J2ME, Brew, Windows CE/Pocket PC locked to the mobile operator.
        simion314 6y ago
        OK. Let's assume that Apple wins. Smartphones makers can legally completely lock the users so you run only what they approve. In your opinion if Android is locked then is the argument "use Android if you don't like iOS walls" completely obliterated? I am curious if TikTok gets banned and then will Apple remove the app from existing phones or somehow block it and will they do it for non US citizens (inside and outside US).
        pjmlp 6y ago
        No, because that is how game consoles have been doing for 40 years now. I also don't get to choose what goes into my cable tv box software although it runs some strange Linux distribution, and I really don't care.
        simion314 6y ago
        Your arguments are ilogical, try thinking more before commenting, is like saying "We could shit behind our homes since generations but the new king is demanding we build toilets and also to wash our hands" - if something was legal in the past for millennia does not mean it should not change. Consider that there will be a judge and a trial and you can't claim that someone else started it , you need to show the judge that the users are not hurt by Apple businesses and IMO if we are lucky a law will be passed that will also fix console issues too.
    - SomeHacker44 6y ago
      For what it is worth, people actually in the real world do just that: buy property adjacent to a municipal airport and then cause problems for airport users... All the time. (Pilot for almost three decades.)
  - dr_dshiv 6y ago
    Why is this any different from Apple saying that you can't download other software on your Macbook, unless you pay Apple 30% and buy it from their store?
  - coldtea 6y ago
    The only reason the want to use the Apple hardware is because Apple makes it and comes with Apple software and Apple roadmaps. If being more open magically offered the same quality all kind of third party open platforms would have flourished. But even in the semi-closed Android you have 95% of mobile malware according to surveys, devices abandoned without updates after 1-2 releases, tons of crap trojan apps, widespread spyware, and so on... A third party app store can be fine at first. "You can chose whether to use it or not" after all. Then some major software only comes for that store, and now you don't have either a unified store, or a way not to use 2 stores (since you need the software). Then each major vendor (Google, Adobe, Amazon, etc) make their own app stores on the platform. Because, why not? Oh, and Facebook can demand you get their app from their store, where it comes with all kinds of private API abuse and surveillance (some of this might be solvable with stronger sandboxing, if it's not deemed "anti-competitive" itself). Then there are all kinds of minor stores, luring your less tech savvy parents, siblings, etc, with BS offers, more malware, pirated versions of software, etc. Oh, and there are "free" stores, you can just install, all kinds of shady stuff that ocassionally roots your iPhone with 0-days and is not revocable. Suddenly app developers don't feel so good about this ability to have multiple stores. They mainly wanted lower Apple rates, but now they have to ship to different stores, track different vendor rules, and so on. And if they stick to a store or two, they're less discoverable. Now you have meta-services that ship your app to many stores and handle the hassle. But they can not do much for the free stores that give pirated copies of your app, or full title+branding+UI rip-offs of your app by small e.g. Chinese devs. And if one of the big app stores gets popular, they now have control over the platform too. Apple wants to move forward with an API change? Not so fast, the big app store doesn't agree (similar to how Apple was beholden to the goodwill of Microsoft and Adobe back in the day).
    - je42 6y ago
      I wish I could up vote your comment more than once.
  - yazaddaruvala 6y ago
    When I bought my iPhone I knew that I could only use the AppStore. I actually bought the iPhone because of the AppStore, the strict rules Apple has for developers and I prefer that no side-loading can occur. If you or any consumer feels lied to, misled or falsely advertised to, they should return their device to Apple. If enough people choose non-Apple products then Apple might change its position. Until then, buy a different brand.
    - sem000 6y ago
      Exactly! HN is a small subset of Apple customers. The largest piece of the pie don’t care about any of this stuff besides that it works. I specifically bought Apple vs Android for these reasons. I run my life and business form my phone, I trust Apple to provide me with a working experience and support when needed. Imagine having to use another App Store outside Apples control, and an app causes my phone to crash. Who will support me? I have to go digging to the app developer, or the App Store developer, or Apple? Apple went this route to specifically remove the fragmentation of the PC market, and what you see similar in the Android market. The closed system provides better quality. That is why Apple is where it is today.
      - dr_dshiv 6y ago
        Why is this any different from Apple saying that you can't download other software on your Macbook, unless you pay Apple 30% and buy it from their exclusive store?
        sem000 6y ago
        Well, we're not talking about the Macbook here... we're talking about the iPhone. As far as the MacBook goes, it's a different target market. MacBooks are targeted for professionals that do all sorts of things with them. Instead they are beefing up the iPad, which has the same target market as the iPhone. That target market doesn't care about all this crap and just wants their tech to work.
        yazaddaruvala 6y ago
  - dr_dshiv 6y ago
    Apple owns the marketplace on their platform. When they undermine competing payment systems using their monopoly power then they appear to be acting anticompetitively in a manner that is against the consumers best interest. This is only an issue when they use their monopoly power to undermine consumer interests.
    - pjmlp 6y ago
      Consumers get their apps, there is no undermining taking place. Maybe I should complain that Sony abuses the PS4 market so I can't run Switch titles on the PS4.
      - simion314 6y ago
        Exactly, except for Fortnite (very popular ) and other apps tha tApple don't like(Hey,Wordpress) or apps that US does not like ,and the apps that indie developers can't afford to publish(small games that have Win,Mac,Linux and Android version) , and maybe GPL(maybe it changed) apps, but except all those apps consumers can get all the apps they want. But can you write me a logical phrase about what should happen if a judge declares that Apple can continue locking the phones because there is a duopoly and the next day Google does the exact same thing since now is 100% legal.
        pjmlp 6y ago
        That is exactly what I look for as judge decision. It has been legal since ever, game consoles have 40 years of history by now. And back in the 16 bit days, one would need to pay for SDKs. PCs only became open due to IBM's failure to keep ownership of their creation, and Compaq's cleverness in clean room reverse engineering. Since Windows 8 I am a big fan of Windows store app.
        simion314 6y ago
        IMO consoles are an historic thing, this days I think if you pay full price to a console then you should have all the rights to unlock it, and if Sony wants to limit me then this should only work if I did not buy the product but I have a subscription for it. Other giant difference between smartphones and consoles is that smartphones and internet are required for a majority of people (banking, messaging/email, COVID apps, 2FA apps ) I can't tell my bank please make an app for this free OS, or my company please make a 2FA app for this free OS and the reverse the company/bank can tell us "use Android because Apple banned our app because the small bug fix update triggered someone"

pjmlp 6y ago

They have the choice to buy other brands.

dr_dshiv 6y ago
They also have the choice to avoid smartphones altogether. What they want, though, is the ability to use apple hardware and non-apple software. The only reason they can't is because Apple won't let them, unless they pay a 30% commission
- pjmlp 6y ago
  One cannot buy a house besides a landing lane and then complain planes are taking off and landing all day long. If iOS doesn't offer what they want, don't buy Apple, plain and simple, there is nothing more to discuss and the judge will set this straight.
  - harpratap 6y ago
    In developed countries there are laws preventing sale of properties where noise may be so high that it's detrimental to one's health. So if the competition in market is hurting the merchants or consumers, it should be rightfully outlawed.
    - pjmlp 6y ago
      The market is mobile phones, get a device not produced by Apple and be done with it.
      - simion314 6y ago
        But if the judge decides that Apple abuses are legal the Google will do it too, then the you will say "Buy a FSF phone if you don't want Silicon Valley abuses, nobody is forcing you to have a phone or Internet"
        pjmlp 6y ago
        What abuses? They are doing nothing that game consoles haven't been doing for 40 years now, or mobile stores since J2ME, Brew, Windows CE/Pocket PC locked to the mobile operator.
        simion314 6y ago
        OK. Let's assume that Apple wins. Smartphones makers can legally completely lock the users so you run only what they approve. In your opinion if Android is locked then is the argument "use Android if you don't like iOS walls" completely obliterated? I am curious if TikTok gets banned and then will Apple remove the app from existing phones or somehow block it and will they do it for non US citizens (inside and outside US).
        pjmlp 6y ago
        No, because that is how game consoles have been doing for 40 years now. I also don't get to choose what goes into my cable tv box software although it runs some strange Linux distribution, and I really don't care.
        simion314 6y ago
        Your arguments are ilogical, try thinking more before commenting, is like saying "We could shit behind our homes since generations but the new king is demanding we build toilets and also to wash our hands" - if something was legal in the past for millennia does not mean it should not change. Consider that there will be a judge and a trial and you can't claim that someone else started it , you need to show the judge that the users are not hurt by Apple businesses and IMO if we are lucky a law will be passed that will also fix console issues too.
  - SomeHacker44 6y ago
    For what it is worth, people actually in the real world do just that: buy property adjacent to a municipal airport and then cause problems for airport users... All the time. (Pilot for almost three decades.)
- dr_dshiv 6y ago
  Why is this any different from Apple saying that you can't download other software on your Macbook, unless you pay Apple 30% and buy it from their store?
- coldtea 6y ago
  The only reason the want to use the Apple hardware is because Apple makes it and comes with Apple software and Apple roadmaps. If being more open magically offered the same quality all kind of third party open platforms would have flourished. But even in the semi-closed Android you have 95% of mobile malware according to surveys, devices abandoned without updates after 1-2 releases, tons of crap trojan apps, widespread spyware, and so on... A third party app store can be fine at first. "You can chose whether to use it or not" after all. Then some major software only comes for that store, and now you don't have either a unified store, or a way not to use 2 stores (since you need the software). Then each major vendor (Google, Adobe, Amazon, etc) make their own app stores on the platform. Because, why not? Oh, and Facebook can demand you get their app from their store, where it comes with all kinds of private API abuse and surveillance (some of this might be solvable with stronger sandboxing, if it's not deemed "anti-competitive" itself). Then there are all kinds of minor stores, luring your less tech savvy parents, siblings, etc, with BS offers, more malware, pirated versions of software, etc. Oh, and there are "free" stores, you can just install, all kinds of shady stuff that ocassionally roots your iPhone with 0-days and is not revocable. Suddenly app developers don't feel so good about this ability to have multiple stores. They mainly wanted lower Apple rates, but now they have to ship to different stores, track different vendor rules, and so on. And if they stick to a store or two, they're less discoverable. Now you have meta-services that ship your app to many stores and handle the hassle. But they can not do much for the free stores that give pirated copies of your app, or full title+branding+UI rip-offs of your app by small e.g. Chinese devs. And if one of the big app stores gets popular, they now have control over the platform too. Apple wants to move forward with an API change? Not so fast, the big app store doesn't agree (similar to how Apple was beholden to the goodwill of Microsoft and Adobe back in the day).
  - je42 6y ago
    I wish I could up vote your comment more than once.
- yazaddaruvala 6y ago
  When I bought my iPhone I knew that I could only use the AppStore. I actually bought the iPhone because of the AppStore, the strict rules Apple has for developers and I prefer that no side-loading can occur. If you or any consumer feels lied to, misled or falsely advertised to, they should return their device to Apple. If enough people choose non-Apple products then Apple might change its position. Until then, buy a different brand.
  - sem000 6y ago
    Exactly! HN is a small subset of Apple customers. The largest piece of the pie don’t care about any of this stuff besides that it works. I specifically bought Apple vs Android for these reasons. I run my life and business form my phone, I trust Apple to provide me with a working experience and support when needed. Imagine having to use another App Store outside Apples control, and an app causes my phone to crash. Who will support me? I have to go digging to the app developer, or the App Store developer, or Apple? Apple went this route to specifically remove the fragmentation of the PC market, and what you see similar in the Android market. The closed system provides better quality. That is why Apple is where it is today.
    - dr_dshiv 6y ago
      Why is this any different from Apple saying that you can't download other software on your Macbook, unless you pay Apple 30% and buy it from their exclusive store?
      - sem000 6y ago
        Well, we're not talking about the Macbook here... we're talking about the iPhone. As far as the MacBook goes, it's a different target market. MacBooks are targeted for professionals that do all sorts of things with them. Instead they are beefing up the iPad, which has the same target market as the iPhone. That target market doesn't care about all this crap and just wants their tech to work.
      - yazaddaruvala 6y ago
- dr_dshiv 6y ago
  Apple owns the marketplace on their platform. When they undermine competing payment systems using their monopoly power then they appear to be acting anticompetitively in a manner that is against the consumers best interest. This is only an issue when they use their monopoly power to undermine consumer interests.
  - pjmlp 6y ago
    Consumers get their apps, there is no undermining taking place. Maybe I should complain that Sony abuses the PS4 market so I can't run Switch titles on the PS4.
    - simion314 6y ago
      Exactly, except for Fortnite (very popular ) and other apps tha tApple don't like(Hey,Wordpress) or apps that US does not like ,and the apps that indie developers can't afford to publish(small games that have Win,Mac,Linux and Android version) , and maybe GPL(maybe it changed) apps, but except all those apps consumers can get all the apps they want. But can you write me a logical phrase about what should happen if a judge declares that Apple can continue locking the phones because there is a duopoly and the next day Google does the exact same thing since now is 100% legal.
      - pjmlp 6y ago
        That is exactly what I look for as judge decision. It has been legal since ever, game consoles have 40 years of history by now. And back in the 16 bit days, one would need to pay for SDKs. PCs only became open due to IBM's failure to keep ownership of their creation, and Compaq's cleverness in clean room reverse engineering. Since Windows 8 I am a big fan of Windows store app.
        simion314 6y ago
        IMO consoles are an historic thing, this days I think if you pay full price to a console then you should have all the rights to unlock it, and if Sony wants to limit me then this should only work if I did not buy the product but I have a subscription for it. Other giant difference between smartphones and consoles is that smartphones and internet are required for a majority of people (banking, messaging/email, COVID apps, 2FA apps ) I can't tell my bank please make an app for this free OS, or my company please make a 2FA app for this free OS and the reverse the company/bank can tell us "use Android because Apple banned our app because the small bug fix update triggered someone"