3 ms·

Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24412810 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24412810 Also, editorialized title.

by gpm 6y ago

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
pmcollins 6y ago
I thought so too at first about the editorialized title, but there's this quote from the document: > Epic fired the first shot in this dispute, and its willful, brazen, and unlawful conduct cannot be left unchecked.
- mwill 6y ago
  Yeah I hope the title isn't change, Apple has literally accused epic of "Willful, brazen and unlawful conduct"
nanagojo 6y ago
It's not an article link, so don't see how it can be editorialized. The title itself is a quote from the document as well. > Epic fired the first shot in this dispute, and its willful, brazen, and unlawful conduct cannot beleft unchecked. Neither Mr. Sweeney’s self-righteous (and self-interested) demands nor the scale ofEpic’s business can justify Epic’s deliberate contractual breaches, its tortious conduct, or its unfair business practices. This Court should hold Epic to its contractual promises, award Applecompensatory and punitive damages, and enjoin Epic from engaging in further unfair business practices
- gpm 6y ago
  It's not an article, but the document has a title > APPLE’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO EPIC’S COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
  - tomc1985 6y ago
    And "Apple accuses Epic of “Willful, brazen, and unlawful” conduct" seems much more catchy while still using wording from the legal document, wouldn't you agree?
    - runesoerensen 6y ago
      I'm sure GP would agree, as that seems to be the reason for mentioning that the title was editorialized in the first place (and probably also why OP chose the most inflammatory quote in the source rather than the more neutral document title) Inflammatory, click-baity titles can be "catchy" for sure, but that doesn't mean we have to use them here. The fact that it uses "wording from the legal document" doesn't make it a good title, regardless of how catchy it is. ".. please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html In any case it's a dupe as GP correctly pointed out while linking to the existing and more substantial discussion.

Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24412810 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24412810 Also, editorialized title.

by gpm 6y ago

Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24412810 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24412810 Also, editorialized title.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

pmcollins 6y ago

I thought so too at first about the editorialized title, but there's this quote from the document: > Epic fired the first shot in this dispute, and its willful, brazen, and unlawful conduct cannot be left unchecked.

mwill 6y ago
Yeah I hope the title isn't change, Apple has literally accused epic of "Willful, brazen and unlawful conduct"

nanagojo 6y ago

It's not an article link, so don't see how it can be editorialized. The title itself is a quote from the document as well. > Epic fired the first shot in this dispute, and its willful, brazen, and unlawful conduct cannot beleft unchecked. Neither Mr. Sweeney’s self-righteous (and self-interested) demands nor the scale ofEpic’s business can justify Epic’s deliberate contractual breaches, its tortious conduct, or its unfair business practices. This Court should hold Epic to its contractual promises, award Applecompensatory and punitive damages, and enjoin Epic from engaging in further unfair business practices

gpm 6y ago
It's not an article, but the document has a title > APPLE’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO EPIC’S COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
- tomc1985 6y ago
  And "Apple accuses Epic of “Willful, brazen, and unlawful” conduct" seems much more catchy while still using wording from the legal document, wouldn't you agree?
  - runesoerensen 6y ago
    I'm sure GP would agree, as that seems to be the reason for mentioning that the title was editorialized in the first place (and probably also why OP chose the most inflammatory quote in the source rather than the more neutral document title) Inflammatory, click-baity titles can be "catchy" for sure, but that doesn't mean we have to use them here. The fact that it uses "wording from the legal document" doesn't make it a good title, regardless of how catchy it is. ".. please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html In any case it's a dupe as GP correctly pointed out while linking to the existing and more substantial discussion.