3 ms·
I'm pretty sure that having kids contributes in the _opposite_ direction to the maintainability of our planet and our species as a whole. Why do you think it's
by sinsterizme 6y ago
I'm pretty sure that having kids contributes in the _opposite_ direction to the maintainability of our planet and our species as a whole. Why do you think it's a service to humanity when population growth is a growing problem, continuing to get worse, which exacerbates issues like conflict between groups, resource contention and climate issues.
I want to emphasize that a sustainable average number of children per family is not zero [0] but around 1-1.5 for a sustainable population size in 100 years, according to the linked article. So given that you presumably live in a developed country (well educated, and don't need children for labour), and have a human's normal biological urges to reproduce, it's not immoral to produce children, but it's certainly not morally commendable.
[0] https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/yes-overpopulation-problem/ https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/yes-overpopulation-problem/
- jelliclesfarm 6y agoI would put it as half a surviving child per person and we can bring numbers down to carrying capacity within 150 years. I also think we should work towards preserving genetic material so in case of a catastrophe we will still have a diverse human gene pool.