3 ms·
That's a separate argument from claiming that everyone was once a child so they must have benefited from something similar.
by pb7 6y ago
That's a separate argument from claiming that everyone was once a child so they must have benefited from something similar.
- johnjj257 6y agoEven further, just because you benefited indirectly through a parent, someone who doesn't have children is still receiving less benefit than someone with children. They are getting the benefit twice. Whereas a childless person gets it once and indirectly.