2 ms·
In this case it doesn't really, in general it does. You aren't obligated to sue everyone breaking the law just because you sued one person that did, which seem
by gpm 6y ago
In this case it doesn't really, in general it does.
You aren't obligated to sue everyone breaking the law just because you sued one person that did, which seems to be the sum of the "but Xbox and playstation" argument. In that sense, literally not at all.
Intellectual consistency does matter in the sense that courts will... heavily frown upon... you arguing X in one case and not X in another. But that hasn't happened here.
- nmfisher 6y agoI fully expect the court to ask the question though. "Is there any difference between Apple and Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo?" is a logical sequitur to "what's your market?" and "who holds the power?". Epic might say yes, they might say no. Either way, I'm interested to hear the reasoning.