This article makes the dumbest assertions I've heard about quality software development in quite a while. The "study" isn't really a study. Even so, the metric

This article makes the dumbest assertions I've heard about quality software development in quite a while. The "study" isn't really a study. Even so, the metrics that it claims to derive aren't there for the picking. Then throwing in big names like Bill Gates to say "look Bill Gates said it too" is just name dropping. Also this looks like something someone would write in 3 minutes between meetings and never actually proof read. The quality of the writing is really quite low.