3 ms·
I’d also like specifics about the “not statistically significant” part - because otherwise there can be a suspicion of cherry-picking the available data. Which
by null_object 6y ago
I’d also like specifics about the “not statistically significant” part - because otherwise there can be a suspicion of cherry-picking the available data. Which I felt, reading parts 2 and 3 of these blog posts, was definitely a possibility.
- devaboone 6y agoI tried really really hard to put in all of the most significant studies on Vitamin D. Small, low-quality studies didn't make it in, but the major trials did.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- harterrt 6y agoTo start, I appreciate your effort on this post. It looks like it took a lot of work and it does a great job of explaining difficult topics like why controls are important. That said, I don't think it's fair to characterize the COVID study as low-quality. It's worth mentioning contrary results, even if it's an exception that proves the rule.