2 ms·
There are thousands of reasonable hypothesis, and it is extremely costly (and in some cases, nearly impossible) to test. e.g. our bodies need sunlight and chol
by beagle3 6y ago
There are thousands of reasonable hypothesis, and it is extremely costly (and in some cases, nearly impossible) to test.
e.g. our bodies need sunlight and cholesterol in order to synthesize vitamin D; This process also apparently has some other outputs like NO which are much harder to measure since they get used quickly. It is possible that vitamin D is merely (mostly) a measure of the prevalence of this process, and it is the other (harder to measure) outputs are much more important; Or that it's the consumption of cholesterol that's more important than the production of vitamin D; Or that sunlight has other functions we don't measure that are the important ones. Or that it's all just a correlation to some other process we're not even aware of.
That said, my own experience and anecdotally other people I know (and gwern has some blind n=1 experiments on his site to back this up) is that taking vitamin D early in the morning improves sleep at night, and taking vitamin D in the afternoon/evening reduces sleep quality. For that reason alone, I take vitamin D in the morning, and anecdotally, I burn less when I'm in the sun without sunscreen as well.
- merpnderp 6y agoThe NO production might explain most of this through it's anti-inflammatory properties. The instant reduction in blood pressure is likely just the tip of the iceberg for UV's effects on the body.
- maaaaattttt 6y agoIs "NO" Nitric Oxyde in this context?
- pmiller2 6y agoYes.