Yes you're right. One could argue though that those usages would avoid dirty sources of CO2. But I agree that "avoiding to output more CO2" is not a replacemen

Yes you're right. One could argue though that those usages would avoid dirty sources of CO2. But I agree that "avoiding to output more CO2" is not a replacement for "removing CO2", and this is very important indeed. It's just an additional war front, not a replacement.