4 ms·
Your argument is irrelevant. It does not invalidate the research linked above in either case.
by abiogenesis 6y ago
Your argument is irrelevant. It does not invalidate the research linked above in either case.
- tasuki 6y agoWhich argument? All I see is ed25519FUUU asking two questions.
- abiogenesis 6y agoDid you know that what you (and ed25519FUUU) does has a name? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
- tasuki 6y agoI believe you're acting in good faith, and am a little sad you think I'm acting in bad faith. Can't speak for ed25519FUUU, but I certainly do not have anything against the above linked research. I think ed25519FUUU's point was that doing honest research has become tricky: if a researcher were to get a factually correct but politically incorrect result, could the researcher publish it without facing negative consequences? It was not an argument against the linked research, it was just a tangential hypothetical.