4 ms·

Absolutely this. With the culling of most corporate R&D groups over the last 20-30 years, DARPA pie-in-the-sky research projects seem to be one of the last real

Absolutely this. With the culling of most corporate R&D groups over the last 20-30 years, DARPA pie-in-the-sky research projects seem to be one of the last real sources for investigating anything that can't be immediately and quickly monetized.

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
ghaff 6y ago
How much real research, as opposed to early-stage product development, has ever happened at corporations? We can easily name a few specific examples (Bell Labs, Xerox PARC) presumably because they weren't the norm. (And there were doubtless some others at companies that weren't as aligned with what's thought of as today's tech industry such as DuPont.)
- tasogare 6y ago
  Have a look at MSR.
  - ghaff 6y ago
    What about them? They make nice gear. They've done some nice innovation around some of the gear they make. That seems different from pumping multi-millions of dollars into research that may never have direct commercial value--unless you're talking about a different MSR.
    - pedrosorio 6y ago
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Research https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Research
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
- hencq 6y ago
  You might enjoy the book "The Entrepreneurial State" by Mariana Mazzucato makes a similar argument that a lot of innovation is actually driven by the state, because they can afford to invest a lot in research without an immediate payoff. The author mentions DARPA in particular as a great example of the US stimulating innovation that then later benefits companies. For example, while the iPhone is a great piece of innovation, it built on innovations made possible by state funded research.
  - Joe8Bit 6y ago
    There's also a very good book by Bill Janeway (of Wargburg Pincus notoriety) on the same subject called 'Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy: Reconfiguring the Three-Player Game between Markets, Speculators and the State'. He argues the same point about the states roll in RnD (also explicitly calls out DARPA) and also their role in booms and busts.
- projektfu 6y ago
  There’s some, obviously, especially in companies in chemicals and materials. I think the push in the 80s-90s to remove slack from corporations to reward managers and shareholders killed a lot of basic research they were doing for posterity.
tolbish 6y ago
Fusion researchers will read that and feel like chopped liver.
082349872349872 6y ago
Even before then, Wikipedia claims government was, at least in part, responsible for the soda can[1]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Production_Act_of_1950#Cold_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Production_Act_of_1950... [1] as far as I've seen, soviet vending machines used a shared glass. They must've been very confident both (a) that the glasses wouldn't grow legs, and (b) in their public health initiatives. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F68bbzOOOdY&t=2644 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F68bbzOOOdY&t=2644

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

ghaff 6y ago

How much real research, as opposed to early-stage product development, has ever happened at corporations? We can easily name a few specific examples (Bell Labs, Xerox PARC) presumably because they weren't the norm. (And there were doubtless some others at companies that weren't as aligned with what's thought of as today's tech industry such as DuPont.)

tasogare 6y ago
Have a look at MSR.
- ghaff 6y ago
  What about them? They make nice gear. They've done some nice innovation around some of the gear they make. That seems different from pumping multi-millions of dollars into research that may never have direct commercial value--unless you're talking about a different MSR.
  - pedrosorio 6y ago
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Research https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Research
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
hencq 6y ago
You might enjoy the book "The Entrepreneurial State" by Mariana Mazzucato makes a similar argument that a lot of innovation is actually driven by the state, because they can afford to invest a lot in research without an immediate payoff. The author mentions DARPA in particular as a great example of the US stimulating innovation that then later benefits companies. For example, while the iPhone is a great piece of innovation, it built on innovations made possible by state funded research.
- Joe8Bit 6y ago
  There's also a very good book by Bill Janeway (of Wargburg Pincus notoriety) on the same subject called 'Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy: Reconfiguring the Three-Player Game between Markets, Speculators and the State'. He argues the same point about the states roll in RnD (also explicitly calls out DARPA) and also their role in booms and busts.
projektfu 6y ago
There’s some, obviously, especially in companies in chemicals and materials. I think the push in the 80s-90s to remove slack from corporations to reward managers and shareholders killed a lot of basic research they were doing for posterity.

tolbish 6y ago

Fusion researchers will read that and feel like chopped liver.

082349872349872 6y ago

Even before then, Wikipedia claims government was, at least in part, responsible for the soda can[1]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Production_Act_of_1950#Cold_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Production_Act_of_1950... [1] as far as I've seen, soviet vending machines used a shared glass. They must've been very confident both (a) that the glasses wouldn't grow legs, and (b) in their public health initiatives. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F68bbzOOOdY&t=2644 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F68bbzOOOdY&t=2644