3 ms·
Millions seems about right. If it took more than $999 million I’d be pretty surprised. Hydraulics are tricky but they’re not that tricky.
by TaylorAlexander 6y ago
Millions seems about right. If it took more than $999 million I’d be pretty surprised. Hydraulics are tricky but they’re not that tricky.
- andbberger 6y agoThe kinematics are the tricky part. Trajectory planning is still quite difficult today even with our speedy modern CPUs
- TaylorAlexander 6y agoTrajectory planning what? Actually solving the inverse kinematics of 3dof manipulators is trivial. I did so 20 years ago using a Basic Stamp microcontroller for my 18 servo hexapod. I was 15. Planning foot placement is a bit harder but I would say the compute heavy part today would be perception.
- andbberger 6y agoTrajectory planning for foot placement.
- TaylorAlexander 6y agoI think of “trajectory planning” as: you have a known target position and you have to figure out how to get there. That’s not hard with a 3dof manipulator. But figuring out where to place the feet, which I consider a perception problem, is very hard. But I think that’s what you’re talking about and I just use different terminology. That’s why I was confused. Sorry if I came off wrong.