I'm pretty sure I read essentially the same rebuttal here weeks ago. That said, I think it's a valid rebuttal. Would the 'correct' answers be GPT-3 making met

I'm pretty sure I read essentially the same rebuttal here weeks ago. That said, I think it's a valid rebuttal. Would the 'correct' answers be GPT-3 making meta-remarks about how you're giving it stupid prompts? Marcus knew what his conclusion would be and set out to find 'evidence' to support it. I think it's telling that the best he could find is so flimsy.