6 ms·
I was surprised to discover that the tests as used without expert supervision had a 25% misread rate, vs 1% with the display. I think that’s a dire indictment
by danielheath 6y ago
I was surprised to discover that the tests as used without expert supervision had a 25% misread rate, vs 1% with the display.
I think that’s a dire indictment of the education system, but we need to make stuff for the people we have, and a quarter of them can’t read the test.
- reanimus 6y agoIt eliminates a wide variety of sources of error, including user ignorance but also possible issues with colorblindness, poor lighting conditions, or a positive result that's not as easy to discern with the naked eye.
- srtjstjsj 6y ago> a positive result that's not as easy to discern with the naked eye. Those are false negatives in the machine.
- Maxion 6y agoCheck out https://www.reddit.com/r/TFABLinePorn/ https://www.reddit.com/r/TFABLinePorn/ A subreddit where users post positive or probably positive pregnancy tests. Pregnancy tests generally measure hCG concentration in urine, early in the pregnancy concentrations are low and the test line will be very faint if visible at all. It's only later on in the pregnancy when the line will become more visible. Pregnancy also involves a lot of emotion, hope & fear, in combination it's not that surprising that a portion of people misread pregnancy tests.
- jaster 6y agoWow I did not expect that! Many of them are really hard to read actually! A quick example of two positive tests side by side https://i.redd.it/llw9fmn6dxk51.jpg https://i.redd.it/llw9fmn6dxk51.jpg Even worse, sometimes the reaction is so strong that there is a "dye stealer" effect, where the test line steals the ink from the control line. See for example here: https://i.redd.it/skdynwwi6ll51.jpg https://i.redd.it/skdynwwi6ll51.jpg (Notice how the line is on the "wrong" side) No wonder the misread rate is so high indeed...
- DanBC 6y agoStrictly speaking if the control line disappears that's an invalid test. https://www.early-pregnancy-tests.com/inpregtesstr https://www.early-pregnancy-tests.com/inpregtesstr
- srtjstjsj 6y agoThose aren't misreads, those are ambiguous tests. The computer would get false negatives on those.
- prvc 6y ago>1% with the display Which is, high as it is, another surprise! I wonder how that happens.
- Simon_says 6y agoThe bottom 2% of the population is illiterate or severely mentally handicapped and do no better than chance at reading pregnant vs. not pregnant.
- srtjstjsj 6y ago> 1% with the display Source on that? I've only seen 1% reported for lab testing of paper strip.