3 ms·
The actual paper [0] does have some decent details, though it is somewhat heavy. [0] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nan
by shakna 6y ago
The actual paper [0] does have some decent details, though it is somewhat heavy.
[0] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105301
- davidhyde 6y agoToo bad they published it through Elsevier. I would have liked to read their paper.
- CamperBob2 6y agoThat's what sci-hub.tw is for.
- sebmellen 6y agoDoesn't appear to be there yet. See https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105301 https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105301.