2 ms·
If you agree with the conclusion, why wouldn't you just politely concur? I agree it's not the strongest argument, but taking the time to point out that it isn't
by JMTQp8lwXL 6y ago
If you agree with the conclusion, why wouldn't you just politely concur? I agree it's not the strongest argument, but taking the time to point out that it isn't a strong argument weakens the position you ultimately agree with. With the amount of technology that ends up in landfills, characterizing it as ineffective may not be correct.
- ineedasername 6y agoIf your conclusion is correct but not actually supported by you premises the you are correct only by coincidence, lacking true understanding. Probing the premises upon which a conclusion is made, pointing out flaws, and then pointing out stronger reasons... That process strengthens an argument, it doesn't weaken it.
- JMTQp8lwXL 6y agoThat's precisely the point. There was no stronger argument presented in the original comment, leaving the entire argument for 'right to repair' in a weaker position.
- ineedasername 6y agoPointing out a poor argument doesn't require the person to present a stronger on for it to be helpful. A home inspection that reveals a crack in the foundation but doesn't repair it has still rendered a very important service.