> One issue with this argument that hasn't been brought up yet is Kolmogorov complexity. Must random blobs of dust Z will be algorithmically random, not contain

> One issue with this argument that hasn't been brought up yet is Kolmogorov complexity. Must random blobs of dust Z will be algorithmically random, not containing any real structure. This is my issue as well, and something Greg Egan brings up in his FAQ on Dust theory as well. If my state is simply the result of a sampling of domain Y, why is my continuous state so stable? If we're assuming I'm sampling from a uniform (maximally random) distribution of potential states, there are many more state configurations where (for example) the physical laws should break down, then a stable configuration. So there must be some missing element in Dust theory that explains away this randomness.