3 ms·
>"ironically a position that can only be held when you already have peace, freedom, and a strong and effective military" The exact conditions that the US had w
by FpUser 6y ago
>"ironically a position that can only be held when you already have peace, freedom, and a strong and effective military"
The exact conditions that the US had when it attacked Iraq killing boatload of their population directly and indirectly in a process.
- giancarlostoro 6y agoThe precursor peace was mentioned. Are you saying Sadam had some sort of peace treaty with us?
- FpUser 6y agoYou mean not having a piece treaty is a just grounds for war? This is really grasping at straws.
- giancarlostoro 6y agoYou are over simplifying Iraq and Afghanistan. Also misunderstanding the last point: effective military. If someone breaks the peace (9/11) you have to shut it down. We dont have all the secret intel the military had all along, some of it prior to 9/11 easily. Its easy to make assumptions without all the facts but it doesnt fix anything. How many of us would of acted differently if we had the top secret intel the same army had at the time? Theres no way of currently knowing but it wouldnt surprise me if history would not be altered by much.
- FpUser 6y agoI did not say anything about Afhanistan. As for Iraq - the reasons were officially stated and they were false as far as I can remember. It is not me oversimplifying, it is you trying to approve murder of hundreds of thousands people.