4 ms·
I think us developers all tend to know this. But for some reason most employers still don't get this. Almost all job listings look for candidates with specific
by city41 16y ago
I think us developers all tend to know this. But for some reason most employers still don't get this. Almost all job listings look for candidates with specific experience in technology X, rather than just all around smart and able people. When I am job hunting these types of employers are an immediate turn off for me, but they are by far the majority. I wish we could succeed in convincing employers to look at the bigger picture.
- hkarthik 16y agoWhile I agree that you probably miss out on finding a lot of great candidates, there is a significant advantage in finding someone that already knows your chosen platform. Already knowing the OS and Tools allows a new hire to focus on understanding the business domain quickly. For some companies, that's far more important than raw technical ability.
- ulf 16y agoThe "quickly" argument is a strawman, if you plan on having a working relationship that lasts longer than 3 months or so. If you just need someone to upgrade your current Rails 2.3.8 project to 3.0.6 and then move along, by all means get someone with Rails experience. But if you intend to employ that person longer, the specific experience is of diminishing importance.
- phamilton 16y agoThat's why I usually try to describe myself as a bard of programming. Pick a language. Pick a framework. I know enough to get started, and I know where to find answers to my questions.
- ulf 16y agoThis might be another incarnation of the "Nobody ever gets fired for using IBM" phenomenon. HR are more likely aiming at avoiding errors, and not necessarily hiring the best people possible, if those come at a risk. So you can always say "but he had x years experience with Rails" if the hire doesn't pan out.