3 ms·
This is so silly! It’s not even clear what this is an opinion about! How would you lose the the race with solid engineering? How would you win without it?
by wilg 6y ago
This is so silly! It’s not even clear what this is an opinion about! How would you lose the the race with solid engineering? How would you win without it?
- etaioinshrdlu 6y agoShoddy engineering wins all the time! Ever heard of the DOS, Windows, or Android (in the early days)? Tesla could win, with shoddy engineering, if they can convince the public and government (using the classic reality distortion field :) ) their self driving tech is ready for prime time (when, for the sake of argument, presume it's not ready). They could then use the investment dollars generated to take it to the next level and perhaps make it solid over time -- but it could take a long time. In the mean time, the public was effectively deceived as to the true safety level of the product. I would prefer if the opposite happened instead.
- Gravityloss 6y agoYou could have some kind of independent testing for this. Like there is for fuel consumption. It would be really easy to game though. And the surface area would be large.
- Barrin92 6y ago>How would you lose the the race with solid engineering? How would you win without it? marketing, brand image, any of the other dozen things that mask bad engineering quality and sell the customer on some superficial thing. Not just in cars but a ton of consumer products customers can easily neglect engineering quality in favour of some gimmick. Hell even developers constantly choose convenient or shiny technologies over ones that are robust or error free.