4 ms·
Between the title and "WSJ.com" you can almost predict the entire article. One admits, however, mild surpirse that the author literally admits to only doing "a
by notaddicted 16y ago
Between the title and "WSJ.com" you can almost predict the entire article. One admits, however, mild surpirse that the author literally admits to only doing "a cursory review of the data," such is suspected but rarely explicitly confirmed.
- earl 16y agoNot to mention stupidity like this: "hoice of occupation also plays an important role in earnings. While feminists suggest that women are coerced into lower-paying job sectors, most women know that something else is often at work. Women gravitate toward jobs with fewer risks, more comfortable conditions, regular hours, more personal fulfillment and greater flexibility. Simply put, many women—not all, but enough to have a big impact on the statistics—are willing to trade higher pay for other desirable job characteristics." On one side, there's a long history of studies/research showing coercion of women into certain job sectors. On the other hand, this author says, "most women know something else is often at work". So yeah, about par for the wsj.