This article appears to be a summary of the original paper. But, it leaves out some critical points - i.e.: - The papers "Discussion" section concludes with:

This article appears to be a summary of the original paper. But, it leaves out some critical points - i.e.: - The papers "Discussion" section concludes with: "MIS-C is rare but the potential long-term sequelae from this disease are currently unknown." Also, the fact that it says: - ”Children might have no symptoms, no one knew they had the disease, and a few weeks later, they may develop this exaggerated inflammation in the body.“ and then a few sentences later - "...100% had fever, 73.7% had abdominal pain or diarrhea, and 68.3% suffered vomiting." Seems contradictory.