3 ms·
It is sad that the article shows the additional time available as productive/work time. In my experience, the workforce maintains a similar productivity while
by xcambar 6y ago
It is sad that the article shows the additional time available as productive/work time.
In my experience, the workforce maintains a similar productivity while working slower number of effective work hours.
This boost of productivity is explained by the benefits of the loss of stress and commute, the comfort of home, the additional family time etc.
There are downsides of course, such as lack of direct contact, unavailability of an actual office, and mostly the inability to disconnect when everything happens at the same place, aka home.
But I'd like the general discourse to focus more on the fact that the direct benefits are for the employee, with positive side-effects for the employer. As in: let's put the employee at the core of the studies.
- Ozzie_osman 6y agoI love this. It's not just about productivity (which is employer-focused), it's about well-being (which is employer-focused). And working from home is double-edged in that regard, though I believe the positives will generally outweigh the negatives.
- corpMaverick 6y agoDid you mean to say employee-focused the second time ?
- Ozzie_osman 6y agoYes thank you!
- esperent 6y agoI agree, but on the other hand, the goal is to persuade companies that it's a good idea to continue this post-covid. To that end, focusing on benefits to the company will be more effective.