FTA: ”But as Daniels’s survey awaits the rigors of peer review, it has received scant attention, in part because Ohio State has refused to make public any test

FTA: ”But as Daniels’s survey awaits the rigors of peer review, it has received scant attention, in part because Ohio State has refused to make public any testing data about its athletes” So this is an unpublished, un-peer-reviewed paper where the data aren’t available. Basically, someone said something, and the New York Times reported it as fact. That’s simply incredibly irresponsible. So far we’ve seen one of these myocarditis scares debunked completely: https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfDFrancis/status/1298499595056668673 https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfDFrancis/status/1298499595056... and just yesterday, the Penn State doctor had to apologize for admitting that the “30% of all athletes have myocarditis” headline he instigated was essentially hearsay: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/2020/09/penn-state-doctor-13rd-of-big-ten-athletes-impacted-by-coronavirus-developed-heart-issue.html%3foutputType=amp https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/2020... We should be very careful about extrapolating any sort of pre-publication data in this area.