Patents come off as the same problem charging fares for inner-city busses causes. A lot of places have realized that just operating, maintaining, and sustaining

Patents come off as the same problem charging fares for inner-city busses causes. A lot of places have realized that just operating, maintaining, and sustaining the overhead of ticketing, processing payments, and managing the many complications that arise is often not worth the money being made if most people are using annual passes or some such. Same with subways, toll roads, etc. In many of those cases it makes way more sense economically, especially considering time-value of private parties involved, to just stop trying to charge entirely and have the revenue come from elsewhere. I feel it is blatantly obvious in modern society patents (and copyrights, IP in general) operate this way. That the bureaucracy required to put them on a "reasonable" timetable of government granted monopoly whereby society can broadly benefit from the innovation isn't worth the legal, public, and private overhead in maintaining a system that is obviously defunct and outdated. Thats part of what lead me to IP abolitionism, anyway. In practice very few "small" creators file patents, those that do rarely have the means to enforce them (or copyrights), and those that have the means don't have the time because they are too busy creating. Yes, once something you made is out there without IP anyone else can take it, build on it, or just simply repackage it and reuse it. So get your money out of it before its out there, kind of like how anything else you sell works.